Comments and Notes:
2007-06-17 Manual count may be needed.
The RTA vote of May 2006 investigation(s) and/or suites should be persued
with a most important "certified fact".
The "certified fact" is the actual counting of the paper ballots. This
will provide all parties with confirmation of the RTA vote count.
One or more parties ought to ask a Judge to appoint a Master to conduct
a 100% manual count or a 10% manual sample count. If the 10% sample count
yields a 0.1% or greater than 0.1% error, than complete counting the
remaining 90% balanced.
Please note that this certification count might not have an impact on
the "official outcome" of the May 2006 as some public official have
indicated in recent news items.
Thanks and Good Luck
Frank Henry
Cottonwood, Arizona
Tel: 928-649-0249
e-mail: fmhenry4 at netzero dot com "" --guest
Information above is from a privately purchased database and/or unverified user submissions. Please verify all information before depending on it for anything critical. We welcome corrections!